U.S. Supreme Court Decision Could Cause State Bars to Lose Antitrust ImmunityYesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, ruling that a regulatory body of a self-regulated profession (dentists in this case, but the law would apply as well) are only immune from antitrust liability if they are actively supervised by state governmental authorities.

As Avvo GC Josh King wrote yesterday on his Socially Awkward blog: Boom.

The case concerned alleged violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act for unfair competition when the NC Board of Dental Examiners sent cease-and-desist letters to non-dentist teeth-whitening entities throughout the state, claiming they were engaging in the unauthorized practice of dentistry. The FTC stepped in to halt the anticompetitive behavior, and the SCOTUS decision yesterday upheld the FTC’s ruling that the NC dental group had violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The high court agreed with the FTC’s claim that state exemptions from federal antitrust laws do not apply when a self-regulating board is not actively supervised by the state, especially when it is made up of self-interested private businesses.

Following the decision, LegalZoom immediately issued a press release with the headline, “Supreme Court Sides With LegalZoom in North Carolina Dental Board Antitrust Decision.” LegalZoom is currently in litigation with the NC State Bar, which has sent cease-and-desist letters to non-lawyer service providers in that state, and filed an amicus brief supporting the FTC in this case.

What interests me most is the effect this decision will have on state bar advertising review committees, especially those in Florida and Nevada that have been particularly hardheaded and backwards when it comes to attorney marketing.

As Josh noted in his post yesterday, he believes this decision is the end of those committees since the Supreme Court imposed the “active supervision” mandate that requires, “The supervisor must review the substance of the anticompetitive decision, not merely the procedures followed to produce it.”

He tends to believe — and I am hopeful — that the states don’t really want to be in the business of actively supervising state bar committee decisions.

There are some states whose bars are run by the judiciary that this decision would not impact. The states without unified bars include IL, OH, PA, NJ and NY.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

FREE On-Demand Webinar: How Law Firms Can Use Dashboards to Save Time, Increase Productivity and Close More Cases

Do you have the critical numbers you need to run your law firm efficiently at your fingertips?  Dashboards have been used by businesses for years, but law firms have been slow to adapt them to running a more efficient, effective enterprise.

A dashboard provides you with insights into what is working — and what is not — in your marketing programs and other areas of your business.  Rainmaker Institute CEO Stephen Fairley and law firm management expert Micki Love, COO of Hughes & Coleman Injury Lawyers, lead you through this free webinar where you will learn:

  • 5 key metrics every law firm must be tracking every month
  • How to save 100 minutes a day with dashboards
  • Key performance indicators for law firms
  • How a business dashboard can help you grow your law firm
  • 3 areas to audit each month to ensure staff compliance
  • 5 critical questions to ask yourself to create your own dashboard

Hughes & Coleman is a personal injury law firm with seven offices in Kentucky and Tennessee. Micki has demonstrated the knowledge it takes to lead a staff of more than 100 employees and to grow a firm across the country. She has consulted with countless law firms on law firm management, giving them direction and building their knowledge of legal management and marketing.

Register online now to get immediate access to the free one-hour webinar on How Law Firms Can Use Dashboards to Save Time, Increase Productivity and Close More Cases.